I first thought “Oreo!” after reading the prompt, and then immediately began to think what actually counted as candy. Surely something like ice cream is more of a generic dessert than candy candy, and I assured myself that my original answer of Oreo suitably answered the question. However, when I shared to my partner that I was going to make a blog post using this response as a springboard into exploring the topic of what makes something candy or not, I was stopped dead in my tracks by her response:
I don’t really consider Oreos a kind of candy…
Oh.
I guess whether or not Oreos count does not really change the direction I intended for this post to take, but I may now need to identify a new candy. I choose Kit Kats, then.
Wikipedia
As retrieved on February 3rd, Wikipedia admits that a precise definition of candy is not so simple, but can be surmised as:
- A confection.
- A kind of sweet food
- Primarily sugar based.
- Wikipedia even goes further and says that a candy is a specific kind of sugar confectionary.
- This is contrast with something primarily flour based.
- Generally small in size.
- Generally an individually consumed item.
I think an Oreo would definitely count here, but even more interesting is that Wikipedia says that ice cream can be considered a candy, but not generally so in the United States (where I am based).
I realize now that this approach of determining if an Oreo fits Wikipedia’s definition of candy by reading the definition of candy requires more work than checking if Wikipedia does or not, directly.1 They do not. Diving deeper, though, Wikipedia describes Oreo as a type of sandwich cookie, a subcategory of cookie, the latter falling into the baker confectionary category. I suppose this makes sense, but Oreos do not really feel like a real cookie to me, and more of a candy imitation, but I will concede.
Wikipedia does call Kit Kats candy, so I submit that as my answer.
Merriam-Webster
Merriam-Webster does not have an entry for the Oreo snack itself, but does actually mention it in the etymology of the slang term of the same spelling, which does kind of make sense – the snack refers to the trademark, a proper noun. I find such a cookie and a generic cake somewhat similar, with the cookie far more dense and the cake far more spongy, but I certainly never made this connection before.
Candy, on the other hand, is described as a sugary confection, but the definition of confection leaves a lot to be desired: a combination of varied ingredients. Sure.
The literal trademark
The Oreo trademark itself categorizes itself as a type of biscuit. Whether or not this is interpreted as a type of flour baked good like a bread or a cookie, I suppose neither of those really fit what I would consider a candy, so with this mountain of evidence, I cannot in good conscious maintain that an Oreo can really be seen as a candy, so I retract this answer completely. I admit defeat.
I maintain that Oreos do not really seem like an actual cookie to me, but I think that has more to do with me eating mainly softer cookies, so the harder Oreo is a bit farther away from this conceptually.
- I
cmd+F‘d all instances of “candy” and none of the instances described the default Oreo as one. ↩︎



